X60 Ultra vs X12 OmniCyclone
Different approaches at a similar price
Where the published data differs
Every line below is computed from the two manufacturers’ own figures. Attributes neither brand publishes are omitted.
- Suction: X60 Ultra 35,000 Pa versus X12 OmniCyclone 22,000 Pa (59% more). Published data favours X60 Ultra.
- Navigation: X60 Ultra — VersaLift DToF; X12 OmniCyclone — dToF.
- Max climb: X60 Ultra 88 mm versus X12 OmniCyclone 40 mm (120% more). Published data favours X60 Ultra.
- Onboard dustbin: X12 OmniCyclone 250 ml versus X60 Ultra 235 ml (6% more). Published data favours X12 OmniCyclone.
- Obstacle avoidance: X60 Ultra — Dual AI cameras + 3D structured light + LED (280+); X12 OmniCyclone — AIVI 3D 4.0 / RGBD.
Full specification comparison
| Attribute | X60 Ultra | X12 OmniCyclone |
|---|---|---|
| Suction | 35,000 Pa | 22,000 Pa |
| Navigation | VersaLift DToF | dToF |
| Self-emptying dock | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | Yes | Yes |
| Battery runtime | Not published by either | Not published by either |
| Onboard dustbin | 235 ml | 250 ml |
| Obstacle avoidance | Dual AI cameras + 3D structured light + LED (280+) | AIVI 3D 4.0 / RGBD |
| Max climb | 88 mm | 40 mm |
| Noise | Not published by either | Not published by either |
| App control | Yes | Yes |