A3 AWD 2000 vs Navimow X390
Highest-completeness models in the category
Where the published data differs
Every line below is computed from the two manufacturers’ own figures. Attributes neither brand publishes are omitted.
- A3 AWD 2000 lists at $1,599.99, $2,899.01 below Navimow X390 at $4,499.
- Max mowing area: Navimow X390 10,117 m² versus A3 AWD 2000 2,000 m² (406% more). Published data favours Navimow X390.
- Max slope: A3 AWD 2000 80 % versus Navimow X390 50 % (60% more). Published data favours A3 AWD 2000.
- Cutting width: Navimow X390 237 mm versus A3 AWD 2000 201 mm (18% more). Published data favours Navimow X390.
- Navigation: A3 AWD 2000 — OmniSense 3.0 (360 deg 3D LiDAR + Binocular AI Vision); Navimow X390 — EFLS 3.0 (RTK + VSLAM + VIO).
- Noise: A3 AWD 2000 62.8 dB versus Navimow X390 60 dB (5% more). Published data favours Navimow X390.
- Obstacle avoidance: A3 AWD 2000 — 360 deg 3D LiDAR + Binocular AI Vision; Navimow X390 — 300 deg RGB+ToF.
Full specification comparison
| Attribute | A3 AWD 2000 | Navimow X390 |
|---|---|---|
| Max mowing area | 2,000 m² | 10,117 m² |
| Navigation | OmniSense 3.0 (360 deg 3D LiDAR + Binocular AI Vision) | EFLS 3.0 (RTK + VSLAM + VIO) |
| Cutting width | 201 mm | 237 mm |
| Max slope | 80 % | 50 % |
| Battery runtime | Not published by either | Not published by either |
| Boundary wire required | No | No |
| Obstacle avoidance | 360 deg 3D LiDAR + Binocular AI Vision | 300 deg RGB+ToF |
| Rain sensor | Yes | Yes |
| Noise | 62.8 dB | 60 dB |