Matrix10 Pro vs X60 Ultra
Same brand, adjacent models in the range
Where the published data differs
Every line below is computed from the two manufacturers’ own figures. Attributes neither brand publishes are omitted.
- Suction: X60 Ultra 35,000 Pa versus Matrix10 Pro 30,000 Pa (17% more). Published data favours X60 Ultra.
- Navigation: Matrix10 Pro — LDS; X60 Ultra — VersaLift DToF.
- Max climb: X60 Ultra 88 mm versus Matrix10 Pro 40 mm (120% more). Published data favours X60 Ultra.
- Onboard dustbin: Matrix10 Pro 250 ml versus X60 Ultra 235 ml (6% more). Published data favours Matrix10 Pro.
- Obstacle avoidance: Matrix10 Pro — AI RGB + 3D Structured Light; X60 Ultra — Dual AI cameras + 3D structured light + LED (280+).
Full specification comparison
| Attribute | Matrix10 Pro | X60 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Suction | 30,000 Pa | 35,000 Pa |
| Navigation | LDS | VersaLift DToF |
| Self-emptying dock | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | Yes | Yes |
| Battery runtime | Not published by either | Not published by either |
| Onboard dustbin | 250 ml | 235 ml |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI RGB + 3D Structured Light | Dual AI cameras + 3D structured light + LED (280+) |
| Max climb | 40 mm | 88 mm |
| Noise | Not published by either | Not published by either |
| App control | Yes | Yes |