Navimow i105 vs A3 AWD 2000
Highest-completeness models in the category
Where the published data differs
Every line below is computed from the two manufacturers’ own figures. Attributes neither brand publishes are omitted.
- Navimow i105 lists at $799, $800.99 below A3 AWD 2000 at $1,599.99.
- Max mowing area: A3 AWD 2000 2,000 m² versus Navimow i105 506 m² (295% more). Published data favours A3 AWD 2000.
- Max slope: A3 AWD 2000 80 % versus Navimow i105 30 % (167% more). Published data favours A3 AWD 2000.
- Cutting width: A3 AWD 2000 201 mm versus Navimow i105 180 mm (12% more). Published data favours A3 AWD 2000.
- Navigation: Navimow i105 — EFLS 2.0 + VisionFence; A3 AWD 2000 — OmniSense 3.0 (360 deg 3D LiDAR + Binocular AI Vision).
- Noise: A3 AWD 2000 62.8 dB versus Navimow i105 58 dB (8% more). Published data favours Navimow i105.
- Obstacle avoidance: Navimow i105 — VisionFence AI; A3 AWD 2000 — 360 deg 3D LiDAR + Binocular AI Vision.
Full specification comparison
| Attribute | Navimow i105 | A3 AWD 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Max mowing area | 506 m² | 2,000 m² |
| Navigation | EFLS 2.0 + VisionFence | OmniSense 3.0 (360 deg 3D LiDAR + Binocular AI Vision) |
| Cutting width | 180 mm | 201 mm |
| Max slope | 30 % | 80 % |
| Battery runtime | 60 min | Not published |
| Boundary wire required | No | No |
| Obstacle avoidance | VisionFence AI | 360 deg 3D LiDAR + Binocular AI Vision |
| Rain sensor | Yes | Yes |
| Noise | 58 dB | 62.8 dB |